G.) The wedding regarding Mark MEEKS and you may Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

The guy bought and you may improved here what became his family with the next 22 many years and on this place every students was in fact created except both eldest. When you look at the 1891 the guy ended up selling this household and you will ordered area 32 from inside the take off ten in the four kilometers northeast from Chillicothe, he improved and you will remaining once the a home-stead.

Bound so you can and you can authorized just before myself, that it 21st day of Oct

His Religious lives offered thanks to a period of over forty years. He kept firmly towards the Primitive Baptist believe, hence turned his entire consolation in the history days and also by both precepts and example the guy represented the highest variety of a keen Western resident.

Draw MEEKS’ 2nd matrimony, so you can Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] was September 21, 1858 within the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. There is nothing identified regarding the a wedding in order to a beneficial COHEN aside from the wedding permit, filed at Matrimony Book 1, webpage 914, info the wedding just like the anywhere between e, and you may Sarah produced her draw. The marriage is actually did of the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.

T. KERLEY

We, T. T. KERLEY, manage solemnly swear which i have always been 21 years of age, which Skip W. C. MEEKS try 18/eight years old, hence there are no courtroom objections to your Relationship. J. C. WELLS are sworn claims that parents from Skip W. C. MEEKS keeps considering their full agree to the marriage of its child in order to Mr. T.

Sarah and Draw stayed to the west of Haynesville for the Claiborne Parish to own a bit together with most likely only 1 youngster, Willia Celestia MEEKS, new spouse from T. The relatives records mean that Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY came into this world November 30, 1865, from the Promise, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, plus the grave marker implies a date from delivery regarding 1865. I will suggest, although not, your time of birth may have actually already been November 30, 1863 rather than one to day inside the 1865. Of course, there’s no delivery certificate. This new demise certificate is not any help, since it indicates a night out together away from delivery of November 29, 1886, more five years adopting the big date off their particular relationships. It will mean an age at the loss of 52, and since this new passing occurred January sixteen, 1919, she would had been produced during the 1866, deciding to make the 1886 likely a good typographical mistake. In support of the different beginning go out, I have three objections:

• Brand new census taker-in 1870, operating August 23, 1870, revealed that the latest child’s ages was nine. While you are census takers is actually infamously bad at the ages, it is extremely strange, In my opinion, for this younger a child to own a delivery date that far-away. It would simply be 3 years incorrect to the corrected day in place of five years wrong on the 1965 date. The 1880 census taker detailed age because the 18, again too old for often day and incorrect because ahead of her relationship, discussed below, when she was not but really 18.
• The absolute most major conflict I have is the marriage permit, copied verbatim to your shape ?. There’s two alter into the released mode, the original being the criteria that the lady getting about to get years of age instead of adult concur, and 2nd are your aside-dated means is actually published for use into the very first about three digits of your own date getting “187”, that’s entered up on show a night out together off Oct 21, 1881. To own a good November 29th birthday and be seventeen, the entire year out-of birth need to be 1863. In the event that she was ten in the place of about 1 month shy from to try to get, manage the brand new clerk has actually acknowledged the definition of of one’s groom’s brother that the bride’s mothers recognized the wedding?